Shakespearean Comedy: Trust us, it's funny

Passage Analysis
Pyramus
O wherefore, Nature, didst thou lions frame?Since lion vile hath here deflower'd my dear:
Which is--no, no--which was the fairest dame
That lived, that loved, that liked, that look'dwith cheer.
Come, tears, confound;Out, sword, and wound
The pap of Pyramus;
Ay, that left pap,
Where heart doth hop:
(Stabs himself)
Thus die I, thus, thus, thus.
Now am I dead,Now am I fled;
My soul is in the sky:Tongue, lose thy light;Moon take thy flight:
Now die, die, die, die, die.

In this passage a company of "actors" performs at the kingdom of Theseus the tragedy of Pyramus and Thisbe. This passage exemplifies the "comedy" Mr. Klimas assured us existed in Midsummer Night's Dream. Peter Quince, a ridiculously conceited over-actor, essentially takes a paragraph to die. The line "Now I am dead," accompanied by the repetition of "Thus" and "die" is the primary cause for humor in this passage. Attempting to capture the intensity of the moment(and convey what he perceives as his immense talent), Quince transforms what should be a tragic and dramatic moment into a ridiculous ending.

Commentary on the genre:
Four people are miserable. Hermia and Lysander are forbidden to be together because Hermia is promised to Demetrius, who is turn loves Hermia. Helena, who is hopelessly obsessed with Demetrius, finds herself distraught over his adamant refusal to return her love. Sounds hilarious right? Well, leave it to Shakespeare to turn a situation which has the potential for tragedy, into a lofty, light-hearted comedy. Shakespeare is able to take a situation which doesn't necessarily scream hilarity(the play begins with Hermia's life being threatened if she does not yield to custom) into one of his greatest comedies. He accomplishes this through his incorporation of fairies and Bottom's troop of actors, who introduce nonsense and trickery to lighten the atmosphere and solve the lovers' problems in a simple(although completely unrealistic) manner. Shakespeare includes the performance of Pyramus and Thisbe and has the troop of actors make a mockery of it in order to lighten the serious nature of the lovers' problems. It seems as though this play serves as Shakespeare's attempt to turn the drama and day-to-day trials of life into trivial, humorous predicaments that can be just as easily solved as if fairies carried them away.

Personal Response:

I have seen this play performed countless times and loved it. However, when I read the play I was somewhat disappointed. When I saw it performed, I was able to experience the comedy and dream-like atmosphere intended by Shakespeare. I did not experience the same atmosphere, however, when reading it. I instead became aware of how ridiculous the premise of the play is. The main idea embodied by the play is that arranged marriages are wrong and love should be the guiding force in life. The ending is seemingly the perfect happy ending, with Hermia and Lysander, Demetrius and Helena riding off into the sunset. However, Demetrius is bewitched into loving Helena, creating the very situation of forced affection that the play spoke against. How can this be a true happy ending for Demetrius? What about Helena? Sure she has Demetrius' love, but it isn't authentic. This sort of sours the warm and fuzzy feeling expected. Perhaps Shakespeare intended to negate his entire play with this all too perfect ending, asserting that you must seize control of your problems and that absolute happiness does not exist. Whether or not this was his intention, having seen and then read the play, I am bothered by the ending.

Richard III: My hero

Passage Analysis:


"The lights burn blue. It is now dead midnight.
Cold fearful drops stand on my trembling flesh.
What do I fear? Myself? There’s none else by.
Richard loves Richard; that is, I am I.Is there a murderer here?
No. Yes, I am.
Then fly! What, from myself? Great reason. Why:Lest I revenge.
Myself upon myself?Alack, I love myself. Wherefore? For any good
That I myself have done unto myself?
O no, alas, I rather hate myself
For hateful deeds committed by myself.I am a villain"(V.v. 134-135)

Richard III, Duke of Gloucester, is perhaps the greatest villain in literary history. There are few characters which evoke greater hatred than this deformed and hideous historical figure. The above passage follows Richard's dream in which all those who he has killed visit him. Essentially this passage represents Richard's first encounter with his own humanity. He begins to experience something which he believed himself immune to: guilt and fear. He begins to question his emotions, beyond the hatred he feels for, well, everyone. The repetitive use of "I" and "myself," demonstrates Richard's self-reflection. Throughout the play Richard is driven by his personal desires and the desire to cause other's misery, yet he does not realize the condition of his self-loathing. He does not recognize that he truly hates himself. The Duke is amazed by the "...fearful drops standing on [his] trembling flesh..." for he did not know that he felt any sort of responsibility for the murder of those he had killed. Yet, he is left questioning why such a dream would disturb him to such an extent. Richard realizes that he has no reason to love himself and therefore his actions must be a product of his extreme hatred for himself, making him realize "I am a villian."

Commentary on Genre:

It is difficult to imagine that an individual like Richard actually existed. Shakespeare depicts this historic figure utilizing both factual and arguable evidence. While the play provides insight into the tumultuous atmosphere of this time in history(following the War of the Roses), I think the play serves more as an interpretation of Richard as an individual. Shakespeare created an image of Richard based upon his interpretation of the history. The evil nature of Richard, while revealed a great deal from his actions recorded in historic documents, truly comes alive in Shakespeare's interpretation. The language, the persuasive, cunning, and hate-filled lines of Richard III, embody the character far more effetcively than a textbook ever could.

Personal Response:

Although I know that admitting this will result once again in being accused of being a sinister person(as suggested by a certain teacher), Richard III, as of yet, is my favorite work of Shakespeare's. I found Richard's character fascinating. He is the most despicable villain ever to be created, yet people yield to his personality. He is physically deformed, but his personailty is even more warped, yet he is able to persuade a woman standing next to her dead husband(whom Richard had killed) that he would make a good replacement. I found Shakespeare's use of ironic, dark humor extremely effective in embodying Richard's personality, which in itself was fascinating.

Macbeth should invest in some handsoap

Passage Analysis:
[Aside] Two truths are told,As happy prologues to the swelling act
Of the imperial theme.--I thank you, gentlemen.
Aside

Cannot be ill, cannot be good: if ill,
Why hath it given me earnest of success,
Commencing in a truth? I am thane of Cawdor:
If good, why do I yield to that suggestion
Whose horrid image doth unfix my hair
And make my seated heart knock at my ribs,
Against the use of nature?
Present fears
Are less than horrible imaginings:
My thought, whose murder yet is but fantastical,
Shakes so my single state of man that function
Is smother'd in surmise, and nothing is
But what is not.(Act 1 Scene II)


William Shakespeare's Macbeth delves into the realm of decision and possibility, illustrating the implications of fate and corruption of humanity. The tragedy of Macbeth lies in the knowledge he gains from the witches at the beginning of the novel. Just as with other literary characters who encounter the prophesy of their fate(remember Oedipus?), Macbeth initiates his own destruction. Upon hearing he "...shalt be king hereafter!" Macbeth immediately contemplates the limitations of his ambitions. Would he have considered yielding to his dark ambitions had the witches not introduced the idea initially? I think the primary characteristic of Macbeth as a tragic figure originates in the immense internal struggle he grapples with. In this passage Macbeth first addresses the rising desire to become king, which perhaps existed prior to encountering the witches, in the above passage. The beginning of his internal struggle is exemplified by Macbeth's repetitive use of rhetorical questions. He questions himself: "Why hath it given me earnest of success/Commencing in a truth? I am thane of Cawdor: If good, why do I yield to that suggestion/Whose horrid image doth unfix my hair/And make my seated heart knock at my ribs/Against the use of nature?" It is here that Macbeth attempts to rationalize with himself. Shakespeare creates a sort of paradox in the first line "Cannot be good, cannot be ill/if ill why hath it given me earnest success...?" in response to the prophesy of the witches. Macbeth realizes what his motivation for power may lead him to do, yet defends that the result of the news is innocent. He is granted the title thane of Cawdor without lifting a finger; the witches were right about that, so how can anything else they prophesied be bad? This passage serves as a foreshadowing of what is to come. The expected excitement of the moment is decreased by Macbeth's suspicion of the unnatural nature of his newly acquired knowledge("Against the use of nature"). He wishes to enjoy the moment but is shaken by the corruptive nature of his ambitions. Macbeth is shocked by the his thoughts, presumably those plotting the death of the king and is horrified at the minute transformation this prophesy has cause in him. "My thought, whose murder yet is but fantastical/Shakes so my single state of man that function Is smother'd in surmise, and nothing is/But what is not." At this point in the play, Macbeth has not lost his sense of morality. Shakespeare depicts the deterioration of Macbeth's conscience, due to Lady Macbeth's cunning control over him, and identifies this loss of morality as tragedy. This passage demonstrates the initial integrity of Macbeth, highlighting the tragedy of his eventual degradation, which, had he not encountered the witches, could have been prevented.


Commentary on Genre:


When the word tragedy is used in proximity to Shakespeare, one automatically thinks of two- absurd-dead-teenagers. However, Shakespeare redefines tragedy in Macbeth. The character orchestrating a great whole of the murders is the tragic figure. Can you say irony? Macbeth is a victim of fate. He discovers his destiny and is driven to seek it. The tragedy of Macbeth truly lies in his discovery of fate, in his inability to deny that which has been prophesied. When reading this play, the reader is forced to question: would any of these events have occurred had Macbeth not encountered the witches? Could he have become king another way? Was there any escaping this appointed fate? Macbeth is truly a victim of circumstance, eventually destroyed by himself. The witches only disclose his completed fate after Macbeth has acted upon their first prophesy. This in itself is innately tragic because it is possible that Macbeth wouldn't have pursued the first prophesy had he known his ultimate fate. I find the difference in Shakespeare's tragedies extremely interesting. Richard III or The Tragedy of Richard III does not inspire sympathy for the main character. While Macbeth does commit despicable acts, just as Richard, the reader is drawn more to Macbeth. Shakespeare accomplishes this difference in reactions primarily by depicting Macbeth's transformation. At the beginning of the novel he is regarded as noble by all who encounter him, yet he is gradually corrupted by the knowledge of his potential and the urgings of his wife. He then progressively is dehumanized. Richard, however, is introduced as a heinous individual, devoid of all morality. Shakespeare manipulates the reader's perception by depicting these individuals in different stages of dehumanization. Richard seems as though he was born evil. Macbeth, perhaps like all humanity, was born with the capacity to be evil and eventually embraces it. If one believes in the Lord of the Flies/Heart of Darkness notion that all of mankind possesses an inner "darkness," it is because Macbeth yields to this inner darkness that perhaps the reader is able to relate and sympathize with him more readily than Richard.

Personal Reflection:

I first read Macbeth in 5th grade and even though I loved it then, my understanding of the dimensions of the circumstances were extremely shallow. While I'm certain there are still aspects of this play that I do not understand, I really enjoyed reading it. Even though I have read endless books dealing with fate in my high school career, I never really can get enough of them. It is a topic which fascinates me, and I change my mind nearly ever time I read another interpretation of it. As with all of Shakespeare's plays, I would much rather see a performance of the play than read it. While the language alone is incredible, I feel like I am missing a lot which would be provided by the dynamics of the actors.

Blog Post

The poem "Poem" by William Carlos Williams is told from the perspective of an observer. The poet does not specify the exact identity of the speaker because it is not essential to the context of the poem. The speaker is almost removed from the poem, merely describing the occurrences of a seemingly insignificant moment. A rhythm is established in the poem in its use of short lines and few syllable words. The greatest amount of syllables contained in a single word in this poem is four. These short words and lines create a simplistic rhythm, which mirrors the simplistic subject of the poem.
This poem employs run on lines from each three line stanza, consisting of one continuing thought from the beginning of the poem to the end of the poem. The entire poem consists of visionary imagery, describing the movement of a cat slowly from the top of a jamcloset to the inside of an empty flower pot. The imagery is not specific. The audience is not made aware of the size or color of the cat, the height of the jamcloset or the flowerpot. With the use of run-on lines and vague imagery, I think Williams is attempting to merely capture a sense of the experience, rather than complicating it with details.
By entitling this poem "Poem," Williams is making a distinct statement: poetry can be anything. Many may read this poem and notice its lack of rhyme and profundity and deem it unworthy of being considered poetry. In art history we are learning about the impressionists, and a key component of their works was the nature in which they captured their subjects. Rather than concerning themselves with the detail, they merely attempted to capture their impression of the moment. In addition their works often depicted moments that weren't typical subjects of art work. I feel that Williams in the impressionist of poetry in this poem. The moment depicted seems relatively insignificant and the audience is granted only a sense of it.

Three cheers for pretty poems!

The poem "I wandered lonely as a cloud" by William Wordsworth describes a daydreaming episode of the poet when he was feeling low in spirits. The poem consists of a a-b-a-b-c-c rhyme scheme(quatrain couplet rhyme scheme). This scheme is particularly effective in capturing the nature of Wordsworth's experience because it establishes a melodic rhythm to the poem. The rhyming of alternating lines and of the last two lines of every stanza enhances the imagery of the field of daffodils by contributing a "sing-song" element to his description, demonstrating the light-hearted and liberating quality of his daydreaming, which serves as an escape from the trials of life. The speaker of the poem seems to be the poet, as evidenced by the line "A poet could not but be gay" which establishes ethos in the poem, credibility in the authenticity of his experience. Wordsworth allows his audience a peek into his thoughts and his solution to "vacant or pensive" moods, showing that "bliss of solitude" can easily be achieved.
The author uses alliteration and consonance repetitively in this poem. In the first stanza the repetition of the sound of the letter "s" at the end of words is seen in the following: vales, hills, daffodils, trees, and breeze. The second stanza consists of alliteration, repeating the "s" sound at the beginning of words such as stars, shine, stretched, saw, and sprightly. The third stanza also possesses alliteration, with the words glee, gazed, and gay. The fourth stanza repeats the consonance of the first stanza. These techniques create fluidity in the poem, connecting lines in sound and contributing greatly to the tranquil, yet excited tone of the poem. The alliteration of the poem demonstrates the enthrallment of the poet with his subject matter, creating a progressive excitement over the beauty of his imaginings. The consonance used at the beginning and end unites the poem, beginning and closing with the prospect of escape.
I adore this poem. The imagery is astounding. I love how the field of daffodils are described as "Tossing their heads in sprightly dance" because it creates such a happy and vibrant image. Also, I found it really refreshing and unique that Wordsworth did not describe the field of daffodils as waves of flowers, as is very typical in poetry attempting to capture the beauty of nature. Instead Wordsworth comments that while the waves of the lake beside the field were lively and beautiful, the daffodils "Outdid the sparkling waves in glee."

To Waken an Old Lady by William Carlos Williams

The rhythm of this poem lies in the author's utilization of run-on lines, lines in which the sense of the line hurries into the next line, as well as the occasional use of approximate rhyme. Lines 1-6, though separated structurally, together form one flowing thought. This structure in which Williams writes creates the illusion of thought, as if the composition of this poem is the product of random reflection. The rhythm of the poem is interrupted by line ten, which simultaneously serves as a shift in the poem, transitioning from the description of old age, a tumultuous struggle-filled flight, to the eventual resignation of death. Line nine contains a dash, which creates a grammatical pause, and therefore emphasizes the question "But what?" Because this question follows a distinct pause, it has an even greater haunting effect. It demonstrates a pause in the speaker's thought, pondering the nature of this "dark wind," the conclusion of old age. Approximate rhyme is used occasionally throughout the poem, as seen in lines four and seven, with the words failing and skimming, as well as lines eight and twelve with the words rested and buffeted. The speaker of this poem is, it seems, most likely either the woman herself, or the poet observing her realization of the inevitability of death. This makes the poem even more personal and relatable, for it is perhaps told from the perspective of someone who is experiencing and pondering the nature of old age, establishing credibility of the descriptions.
The predominant literary device Williams employs is imagery and metaphors. Visionary imagery of birds "...skimming bare trees above a snow glaze..." creates a somber and sorrowful tone. The "bare trees," "snow glaze," "dark wind," "broken seedhusks," and "shrill piping" creates a sense of hopelessness and death. The poem outlines an old woman's realization or "awakening" to the inevitability of her existence. The " flight of small cheeping birds" is a metaphor for old age, which is "gaining and failing" in its journey, as it is assailed by the prospect of death, represented by the "dark wind." The olfactory imagery of "cheeping birds" and the "shrill piping of plenty" contrasts the faint hope possessed by few prior to death with the harsh cries of "plenty," of all who realize that they too will die and that despite their efforts, it is inevitable.
Although this poem is fluid and tranquil in structure and form, it is extremely depressing. I like it primarily due to its vividness in imagery. The poem is truly an experience. It evokes the image of a pathetic group of faintly cheeping birds, struggling against the wind, "skimming bare trees" as it inches closer and closer to death. The format of the poem eases reading and understanding, with few interruptions in each complete thought. Although the subject and imagery is dark, the sound of the language in this poem is truly beautiful. Though the denotation of "piping of plenty" and "buffeted by a dark wind" are not exactly positive, the sound of these words are awesome and create a soothing rhythm to the poem, despite the unsettling subject.

Siren Song by Margaret Atwood

Speaker: The poem is told from the perspective of the "siren." Atwood utilizes this perspective to convey the true meaning and purpose of her poem. The "siren" is symbolic of the stereotypes about women. The siren is portrayed as the typical vindictive woman; she is the picture of beauty and the embodiment of perfection, but she is not content. She is depicted as creating a false vulnerability and distress in order to lure men in with the promise that they are different and that only they can save her. Atwood is making a clear statement on society's perception of women: they can only get what they want by playing the "damsel in distress," by luring men with their helplessness only to "trap" them in commitment, a fate synonymous with death. Atwood's satire of society's impression of women is evident in the line "It's a boring song but it works every time." Although the siren laments over the curse of her "picturesque and mythical" beauty, she is only doing so to portray herself as a victim, which in turn will lure unsuspecting men to save her, when in reality she doesn't require saving. Through the speaker, Atwood conveys her discontent with society's conception of the goals of women: to be irresistible and seduce men into commitment by feigning coyness and imprisonment.
There seems to be no particular rhyme scheme in this poem; however, the poem has a song-like rhythm. The line "I will tell the secret to you, to you, only to you" is especially similar to the lines of a song, due to its repetition. This similarity to song contributes to the overall effect of the poem, most simplistically, due to the subject of the poem. This style allows the audience to almost hear the speaker sing these words, making her more substantial and further accomplishing the allusion to the mythical creature.

Literary Devices:

Repetition: "I will tell a secret to you/ to you, only to you...Only you, you can/ you are unique/ at last" Repetition of the word "you" and "only" is crucial in these lines for it emphasizes Atwood's statement, revealing society's belief that women possess an irresistible power over men. It is with the repetition of the word "you" that the "siren," though bored with her routine, is able to capture the man's attention, making him feel special and individual, when in reality he is just another victim to her song, a song which has become a second nature to her due to its own repetition of victimization.

Allusion: In Greek mythology, Sirens are creatures with the heads of females and the body of birds. They lived on an island and possessed the irresistible charm(through song) to lure mariners to their destruction on the rocks surrounding the island. Atwood parallels society's perception of women with the nature of the sirens in order to highlight the negative attitude towards women. The idea that the siren's appearance is merely a facade is demonstrated by the line "...will you get me out of this bird suit?" demonstrating that the freedom implied by the creature's wings is an illusion(perhaps this is referring to fact that women's equality too is an unjust illusion), and therefore they are incapable of saving themselves.

Reaction:
What I really like about this poem is the gradual shift that occurs. The poem begins somewhat tragically, revealing the hardship endured by "...the one song everyone would like to learn: the song that is irresistible..." The poem then highlights the speaker’s “true” feelings about her existence, that it is merely an imprisonment, due to unwanted beauty. Yet, the speaker then states “…come closer…,” and suddenly the reader knows that her lament was only an extension of her deadly craft. The last line: “It is a boring song but it works every time,” is satirical in nature and is somewhat hilarious. It shows the speaker shrugging off her actions, a distinct comment made by Atwood about the negative opinion of women.

James Joyce. Even the man's name is alliteration!

Analysis:

A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man by James Joyce centers around the life of Stephen Dedalus. The narration is frequently interrupted by stream of consciousness narration and never strays too far from the main subject(Stephen). Joyce's style is particularly unique, and therefore greatly confusing, due to his ability to convey Stephen's tumultuous journey of self-discovery, while simultaneously capturing the climate of the time. On page 232 Stephen describes three different forms of literary tradition. Initially I thought that the lyrical form, described as "the form wherin the artist presents his image in immediate relation to himself," was the form which Joyce decided to write this novel. However, it seems that the epical form:” the form wherein he presents his image in mediate relation to himself and others" is the true form of Portrait. In class some people agreed that Stephen comes off as a somewhat arrogant and selfish person. With a format that revolves around the growth of Stephen as a person, highlights his innermost emotions and turmoil, it's hard for ego to necessarily be separated from our perception of him. The novel introduces other characters but in relation to Stephen, and what emotions they evoke in him. His father is caught in perpetual reminiscence, unable to face the reality of his bankruptcy and the disintegration of his family. His mother is distraught over his disillusionment with the church. Stephen's siblings are barely mentioned throughout the entire novel. Essentially, characters are introduced in the context of Stephen's experience. It is for this reason that Stephen seems to be self-absorbed, and in a sense, he is. He does not do anything unless he has a particular drive to do so, as seen when he refuses to go to communion for the simple happiness of his mother.

Quote:

" Stephen walked on at his father's side, listening to stories he had heard before, hearing again the names of the scattered and dead revelers who had been the companions of his father's youth. And a faint sickness sighed in his heart. He recalled his own equivocal position in Belvedere, a free boy, a leader afraid of his own authority, proud and sensitive and suspicious, battling against the squalor of his life and against the riot of his mind. The letters cut in the stained wood of the desk stared upon him, mocking his bodily weakness and futile enthusiasms and making him loathe himself for his own mad and filthy orgies. The spittle in his throat grew bitter and foul to swallow and the faint sickness climbed to his brain so that for a moment he closed his eyes and walked on in darkness"(97).

This passage demonstrates the nature of the relationship between Stephen and his father. The passage illustrates the emotional turmoil Stephen is experiencing and his acute shame and disgust with himself. He describes the demons of his thoughts as filthy and mad and swallows the "bitter and foul" acknowledgement of his existence. Stephen's personal "darkness" contrasts the jolly episodes his father recounts, emphasizing the distance between them, despite their physical closeness. I found this passage particularly ironic because Stephen recalls his own days as a student at Belvedere, yet he feels incapable of confiding or relating to his father. Even after seeing the word "foetus" carved into the desk, a discovery that spurred somewhat of a revelation that he is not alone in harboring what he deems forbidden and disgusting thoughts, Stephen remains(if not more so) disenchanted with his father. This disillusionment, I think, comes primarily from the fact that his father maintains that he and his school friends were gentlemen and encourages Stephen to mix with said "gentlemen"(97). Stephen seems to feel that his father is a hypocrite, and therefore feels it is futile to even attempt to confide in him and instead retreats to his solitude.

Reaction:

There seems to be a pattern with the books we are reading lately in this class: they are the types of books that in order to experience the work to its full magnitude, I have to read it again, and again, and again. This first time through I found the reading frustrating and confusing. I tried to understand what was happening plot wise, while still trying to appreciate the language. I kept finding myself getting caught up in the structure and sound of the sentences(because Joyce's combination of words are incredible, especially his use of alliteration) to the point that I'd reach the end of the page blown away by the words, but completely ignorant of what was actually being said. I think that I would love this book if I read it a second time(and I plan to) because it would be a little bit easier to connect meaning and structure.

Invisible Man

ANALYSIS:

In the prologue of Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison, the narrator proclaims he has exactly 1,369 lights in his "hole." His "battle" with Monopolated Light and Power is symbolic of his battle with society to gain identity. The fact that the electric company has the word "Monpolized..." in its name (although spelled incorrectly) is revealing of this symbolism. Like the company controls light, society controls and denies the narrator of an identity. Light symbolizes knowledge, while dark represents blindness. Prior to his revelation of his invisibility, society kept him "running" towards a promised identity, towards invisible equality and greatness. Just as he secretly steals light from the company, the invisible man asserts his existence in secret. Although others are unaware and ignorant of his invisibility, he recognizes the corruption of society and surrounds himself in the truth that he had once been blind to. By surrounding himself with light, he is "confirming (his) reality, giving birth to [his] form"(6). The narrator states that "Without light I am not only invisible, but formless as well; and to be unaware of one's form is to live a death. I myself, after existing some twenty years, did not become alive until I discovered my invisibility"(7). This statement is somewhat of a paradox. It was not until he fully discovered his invisibility in society that he felt truly alive. The narrator surrounds himself in light to assign definitiveness to existence, he may be invisible, but he knows it, recognizes it, saving himself from the darkness of ignorance and futility of ambitions.

QUOTES:

"I sensed vaguely and with a flash of panic that the moment I walked out upon the platform and opened my mouth I'd be someone else. Not just nobody with a manufactured name which might have belonged to anyone, or to no one. But another personality. Few people know me now, but after tonight...how was it? Perhaps simply to be known, to be looked upon by so many people, to be the focal point of so many concentrating eyes, perhaps this was enough to make one different; enough to transform someone into something else; just as by becoming an increasingly larger boy one became one day a man; a man with a deep voice-although my voice had been deep since I was twelve..."(336)

This passage is a commentary on the narrator's search for identity. Prior to discovering his perceived invisibility, the narrator assigns himself a purpose in the Brotherhood. He believes that he will gain an identity by being something to others by connecting to his audience and representing hope to others. He is frightened initially by the prospect of gaining a new identity but later embraces discarding of his past. The narrator compares this change to a boy becoming a man when his voice changes. I think this analogy demonstrates the flaw in the narrator's attempt to gain identity through the brotherhood. I may be wrong, but a voice change doesn't transform a person into an entirely new person. The narrator hopes that in becoming an esteemed figure, he will finally have a purpose and have accomplished something. He hopes that by representing the Brotherhood he will be able to abandon his past and avenge Bledsoe's betrayal.

Reaction:

This book is perhaps the most complex and symbolic work I've ever read. It is incredibly powerful due to its disturbing depiction of the plight of African Americans seeking equality and the heinous treatment during such scenes as the Battle Royal. Ellison's repetitive use of motifs such as blindness and the opposition of black and white is extremely effective in emphasizing the struggle which the narrator faces and the state of society during this time of racial turmoil. Overall I liked the book a lot, but I’m definitely going to have to read it again in a year or so to appreciate the full impact of the novel. I found the book a tad overwhelming and therefore missed a great amount of symbolism just because the novel is so dense, and there’s symbolism in each paragraph.

Heart of Darkness: Story of my Life

ANALYSIS:

"This man suffered too much. He hated all this, and somehow he couldn't get away. When I had a chance I begged him to try and leave while there was still time; I offered to go back with him. And he would say yes, and then he would remain; go off on another ivory hunt; disappear for weeks; forget himself amongst these people-forget himself-you know"(95).

This statement made by the the Russian demonstrates Mr. Kurtz's inability to escape the "darkness" within himself. The Russian justifies Mr. Kurtz's actions by portraying him as a victim, an ironic concept considering that the man has heads on stakes surrounding his house. I found this quote interesting primarily because it slightly contrasts the excerpt from The Things They Carried. Mary Anne says "I feel close to myself...I know exactly who I am"(111). In this passage from Heart of Darkness, however, the Russian describes that Kurtz has forgotten himself. Throughout the novel the concept of discovering one's own "inner darkness" is a predominate motif. The Russian is blinded by his devotion to Kurtz, holding onto his inspiring talks of love with Kurtz, excusing his actions with his immense sorrow and supposed loss of self. Mary Anne embraces her transformation because it makes her feel more alive, while there is definitely an aspect of self loathing in Kurtz. I believe that deep down Kurtz hated who he had become("...he hated all this...") but was so engulfed in his own evil and obsession that his hatred was not recognized as that of himself, but was realized in his savagery and apparent lack of morality. He cannot escape his lust for ivory, the driving force in the emergence of his inner darkness. While I understand the Russian's claim that Kurtz forgot himself, I think it's more accurate to say he discovered a part of himself that had never before been realized. Mary Anne, despite her highly fashionable necklace of human tongues, justifies her actions by saying they aren't "bad." Heads on stakes surrounding his house makes sense to Kurtz, it isn't "bad," it's a reasonable choice of decoration(just like figurines of Poe and fake beating hearts). I think that Kurtz has forgotten himself in the sense that he has denounced the guidelines of morality in society and embraced the darkness that has always existed.

QUOTE:

"She was sure. I heard her weeping; she had hidden her face in her hands. It seemed to me that the house would collapse before I could escape, that the heavens would fall upon my head. But nothing happened. The heavens do not fall for such a trifle. Would they have fallen, I wonder, if I had rendered Kurtz that justice which was his due? Hadn't he said he wanted only justice? But I couldn't. I could not tell her. It would have been too dark-too dark altogether" (131).

Kurtz had been many things to many people. A painter, a poet, an inspirational speaker. Yet few recognized the darkness which consumed him. Marlow becomes incredibly cynical by the end of the novel and recognizes how blind society is to the evil that exists in mankind. Despite his revealation, he maintains Kurtz's fiance's perception of Kurtz by saying that his last words were her name. He is incredibly disheartened by her confidence that he speaks the truth, that Kurtz died the man she thought he was. The word trifle in this passage is somewhat of an understatement. Trifle refers to Marlow's continued contribtion to the ignorance of society, allowing his fiance to believe he was the poetic and powerful man she loved, instead of a being of disintegrating humanity. His question as to whether the detrimental truth or a reassuring lie was worse(i.e. which would result in the heavens collapsing upon him) is a question as to whether it is up to him to reveal the darkness of humanity. Kurtz asserts( in his warped mind) that all he ever wanted was justice. Marlow's decides that the truth would just bring the darkness upon he and Kurtz's fiance and that he cannot dissolve the perceptions of Kurtz.

OPINION:

The first time I read this book, I hated it immensely. The second time I understood it, and I actually liked it. While the subject is a bit much for me, the examination of humanity and its conclusion that all humanity possesses evil(which can be brought out by one's surroundings) makes sense to a degree. I'm not saying that heads on stakes are reasonable, just that the idea that one's surroundings can transform and distort an individual's sense morality coincides with the whole tabula rasa concept. It's definitely not one of my favorite books but I think the concept is essential to be familiar with for other works.